Parent-Child Joint Ownership of House in Canada: Benefits, Risks, and Alternatives

Joint ownership of property between parents and children is a topic that generates significant interest and discussion in Canada. It's a strategy often considered for estate planning, facilitating property transfer, or simply assisting a child in entering the housing market. The concept appears straightforward on the surface, but beneath lie layers of legal, financial, and tax considerations that require careful evaluation.

Parent-child joint ownership of house in Canada refers to a specific legal arrangement where both a parent (or parents) and their adult child (or children) hold title to a property together. The most common form of this arrangement is "Joint Tenancy with Right of Survivorship" (JTWROS), which dictates how ownership is transferred upon the death of one of the owners. This article will delve into the intricacies of this arrangement, exploring its advantages, disadvantages, and alternatives, providing a comprehensive guide for families considering this path.

Understanding Joint Tenancy with Right of Survivorship (JTWROS)

The cornerstone of most parent-child joint ownership arrangements in Canada is Joint Tenancy with Right of Survivorship (JTWROS). Understanding this legal concept is crucial. It differs significantly from "Tenants in Common," another form of co-ownership.

Calculate your taxes with our free tax calculator.

Use our IRPF 2024 calculator to quickly calculate your tax refund or the amount you owe.

Calculate >

Key Features of JTWROS

• Automatic Transfer: This is the defining characteristic of JTWROS. Upon the death of one joint tenant, their share of the property automatically and immediately transfers to the surviving joint tenant(s). This transfer occurs outside of the deceased's will and bypasses the probate process. This avoids probate fees.
• Equal Ownership: Typically, each joint tenant holds an equal and undivided interest in the property. This means that regardless of the initial financial contributions made by each party, ownership is split equally. For instance, if a parent and child are joint tenants, each owns 50% of the property.
• Unanimous Consent: Any major decisions regarding the property, such as selling, refinancing, or placing a mortgage on it, require the unanimous written consent of all joint tenants. One joint tenant cannot act unilaterally.

Potential Benefits of Parent-Child Joint Ownership

Several factors can make joint ownership an attractive option for families. These benefits often center around estate planning simplification and potential tax advantages.

Simplified Estate Planning

The automatic transfer feature of JTWROS significantly streamlines the estate administration process. Probate, the legal process of validating a will and distributing assets, can be time-consuming, costly, and emotionally draining for families. By avoiding probate, the property transfer is quicker, and the associated legal and administrative fees are minimized or eliminated.

Potential Tax Advantages

In certain situations, joint ownership can offer tax benefits. While a detailed discussion of tax implications is provided later, it's important to note that the potential for reducing capital gains taxes exists, particularly if the property is the parent's principal residence.

Security and Peace of Mind

For many parents, knowing that their home will seamlessly transfer to their child upon their death provides a sense of security and peace of mind. It removes uncertainty and potential complications associated with the estate process.

Shared Responsibility

Adding a child to the title can foster a sense of shared responsibility for the property. The child may feel more invested in maintaining and caring for the home, knowing they have a direct ownership stake.

Potential Drawbacks and Risks of Parent-Child Joint Ownership

While joint ownership offers potential benefits, it also carries significant risks and potential drawbacks that must be carefully considered. These issues can range from loss of control for the parent to legal and financial complications for both parties.

Loss of Control

By adding a child as a joint tenant, the parent relinquishes some control over the property. As mentioned earlier, all major decisions require unanimous consent. This means the parent cannot sell or refinance the property without the child's agreement, even if the parent's circumstances change and they need to access the equity in the home.

Legal Risks: Child's Creditors or Marital Breakdown

The child's financial or marital situation can directly impact the jointly owned property. If the child faces creditor issues, the property could be subject to claims by those creditors. Similarly, if the child experiences a marital breakdown, the property could become part of the divorce settlement, potentially forcing a sale.

Tax Implications

The tax implications of joint ownership are complex and can be both positive and negative. There may be tax consequences upon the initial transfer of the property into joint tenancy, and different tax implications may arise upon the parent's death, depending on whether the property is the parent's principal residence and other factors. The adult child, if they don't live in the property as their principle residence, could face capital gains.

It is imperative to seek tax advice.

Sibling Disputes

If only one child is added to the title as a joint tenant, it can create resentment and conflict among siblings. The other children may feel excluded or believe that the arrangement is unfair, potentially leading to strained family relationships.

Incapacity of a Parent

If a parent becomes mentally incapacitated, they lose the ability to change their will. This could lead to unintended consequences regarding the distribution of their assets, including the jointly owned property. If the original intention was for the property to be divided equally among all children, but only one child is on title, the incapacitated parent cannot rectify this situation.

The Importance of Documenting Intention: Pecore v. Pecore

The Supreme Court of Canada case, Pecore v. Pecore (2007 SCC 17), significantly impacted the legal understanding of parent-child joint ownership of house in Canada. This landmark decision established the "presumption of resulting trust" in situations where a parent gratuitously transfers property into joint tenancy with an adult child.

• Presumption of Resulting Trust: This legal presumption means that, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, the adult child is deemed to be holding the property in trust for the parent's estate. In other words, the child is not considered the beneficial owner of the property; they are merely managing it on behalf of the parent. The property will be included in the parent estate.
• Rebutting the Presumption: The child can rebut this presumption, but the onus is on them to provide clear and compelling evidence that the parent intended to *gift* the property to the child outright. This evidence must demonstrate that the parent intended for the child to become the sole beneficial owner of the property upon the parent's death.

Because of the Pecore decision, meticulous documentation of the parent's intention is absolutely crucial. Failure to do so can lead to costly litigation and family disputes.

Evidence of Intent to Gift

Several factors can be looked at to assess intent:

• Banking Documents: Wording within banking documents pertaining to the transfer is important. Did the documents show the deceased parent understood and intended the implications of the transfer, and the right of survivorship?
• Control and Use of Assets: After the transfer was the property used by the adult child for their own benefit?
• Power of Attorney: Was power of attorney also granted to the adult child, in addition to joint ownership?
• Tax Treatment: Who handled the tax implications of the assets?
• Terms of the Will: Did the deceased parent's will stipulate their intention to gift the joint assets to the adult child?
• Third Party Evidence: What did lawyers, investment advisors or bank employees discuss with the parent at the time of the transfer?

Alternatives to Joint Ownership

Given the potential complexities and risks associated with joint ownership, it's essential to explore alternative strategies for transferring property or assisting a child with homeownership.

Gift or Bequest

Parents can choose to gift the property to their child outright during their lifetime or leave it to them in their will. This provides the child with complete ownership and control, but it may have immediate tax implications for the parent, particularly if the property is not their principal residence.

Intrafamily Loan

Parents can provide a loan to their child to help with a down payment or mortgage payments. This loan can be structured with specific terms, including interest rates and repayment schedules. This approach allows the child to build equity in their own name while receiving financial assistance from their parents. It is critical to document the loan in writing.

Bargain Sale

Parents can sell the property to their child at a price below fair market value. This "bargain sale" can be a way to transfer the property while minimizing the financial burden on the child. However, there may be tax implications associated with the difference between the sale price and the fair market value.

Life Estate

A life estate is a form of trust. This can be used if there is concern the surviving spouse's estate may not benefit the same 'ultimate beneficiaries.

Recommendations and Best Practices

Navigating the complexities of property ownership requires careful planning and professional guidance.

Seek Professional Advice: It is crucial to consult with a real estate lawyer and a financial advisor before making any decisions regarding joint ownership or other property transfer strategies. These professionals can provide tailored advice based on your specific circumstances and help you understand the legal and tax implications of each option. Avoid relying solely on advice from bank personnel, as they may not be qualified to provide comprehensive legal or financial guidance.

Consider Family Circumstances: A thorough assessment of your family's financial situation, potential future needs, and the relationships between family members is essential. Open and honest communication among all parties involved is crucial to avoid misunderstandings and potential conflicts.

Document Everything: Regardless of the chosen strategy, ensure that all agreements, transfers, and intentions are properly documented in writing and legally binding. This includes creating a "Deed of Gift" if the intention is to gift the property to the child, clearly outlining the terms of any intrafamily loans, or having a lawyer draft a comprehensive will that reflects your wishes.

Conclusion

Parent-child joint ownership of house in Canada, particularly under the JTWROS arrangement, presents a multifaceted scenario with both potential advantages and significant risks. While the allure of simplified estate planning and potential tax benefits is undeniable, the potential for loss of control, legal complications, and family disputes necessitates a cautious and well-informed approach. The *Pecore v. Pecore* decision underscores the critical importance of clear documentation of the parent's intention. Exploring alternatives to joint ownership, such as gifting, intrafamily loans, or bargain sales, may be more suitable for some families. Ultimately, the best course of action depends on the unique circumstances of each family and should be determined in consultation with qualified legal and financial professionals.

What further questions do you have about parent-child joint ownership, and have you considered discussing these options with your family and a professional advisor?

If you want to know other articles similar to Parent-Child Joint Ownership of House in Canada: Benefits, Risks, and Alternativesy ou can visit the category Tax Deductions.